devos from the hill

The Uniqueness of The Bible – Part 1


Lesson 3
The most unique and the most published book in history.


The Bible is the most quoted, most translated, most published book in human history, completely unique in its creation, content, and accuracy.1 And while the uniqueness of the Bible does not irrefutably prove that it is the revelation of God, when one truly considers the nature of this book, it takes more faith to believe that it was simply written and compiled by humans than to believe that it is a work of God. Let’s think about this.

The Bible is unique in its diversity and harmony.

Written over a span of 40 generations and about 1,600 years, by more than 40 authors from varying walks of life, on three continents (Asia, Africa and Europe) and in three languages (Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek), the Bible is unlike any other book in the world. It includes history, poetry, prophecy, law, parables and preaching, and covers a broad range of subject matter (including hundreds of controversial topics) from the nature of God to the origin of man.2

Considering the diversity of its writers and subject matter, one might expect at least some conflict or inconsistency in the content and themes presented in the Bible, and yet…

  • The Bible is one complete epic story centered around one extraordinary character.
  • The Bible addresses numerous topics and themes throughout the text with incredible harmony and resolution. (For instance, the paradise lost of the first book of the Bible becomes the paradise regained of the last book of the Bible. The access to the Tree of Life, which was closed in the first book of the Bible, is opened forevermore in the last book of the Bible.)

Like the instruments in a symphony, each writer of the Bible is quite different from the others. When you hear an orchestra playing with flawless harmony, you naturally assume that it is being directed by an accomplished conductor. Why should we think any differently in regard to the Bible, which is far more complex in content and scope than any symphonic score?

The Bible is unique in its textual reliability.

Because original manuscripts rarely (if ever) exist for the world’s most important ancient literary works, the question must be asked of any ancient book, “Do the earliest copies in existence accurately convey the content of the original document?” In other words, has the original document changed over time? Scholars consider several factors when determining what is known as textual reliability. These include:

  • The method by which copies were made
  • The time between the earliest known copy and the original manuscript
  • The number of early copies in existence
  • The comparative consistency of the earliest copies

Measured by these standards, there is no other book in the world that even comes close to the textual reliability of the New Testament of the Bible.3 Note in Table 1 at the end of this lesson,4 that those who made the earliest copies of the New Testament were either contemporaries of, or only a few generations removed from, the original writers. Notice also the number of copies that were made within that period of time. The difference between the New Testament of the Bible and other ancient works is astounding.

Unlike the New Testament, there is not an abundance of early copies of the Old Testament of the Bible. So, when one considers the textual reliability of the Old Testament, it is important to understand the method by which these ancient manuscripts were copied.

The copying process,5 itself was reserved for a special group of people in Jewish culture known as scribes. Scribes were professional penmen who copied manuscripts using a strict systematic process to achieve the highest accuracy possible. For example:

  • The scribes were not allowed to copy sentence–for–sentence or even word–for–word. They copied letter–for–letter.
  • A scribe had to copy the original page so that the exact number of words on the page remained unchanged. If an original page had 296 words, then the page being copied must contain the same 296 words.
  • Each line on a new page had to be the exact length as the line on the old page. If the first line on the original page had nine words, the first line on the copy page had to have nine words.
  • After each page was copied and checked by another, still a third person would check to verify that the middle letter on the copied page was the same as the middle letter on the original.
  • If a single mistake was made, the copy was destroyed.

These steps ensured that copies of Old Testament manuscripts accurately conveyed the content of their originals. As is the case with the New Testament, no other ancient manuscript in the world surpasses the textual reliability of the Old Testament.

Ask & Reflect

• Does the information you have studied today change the way you view the Bible?
• If so, how? If not, why not?
• What would it take for you to look at the Bible in a different way, or perhaps to see something you’ve not yet seen? (This question is for those who are already familiar with the Bible as well as those who are not.)

Decide & Do

Today’s lesson was a little longer than most of the lessons in this study. If you didn’t feel that you were able to digest all of the information here, set aside some time to come back to it.

For Further Study

• Josh McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict, Thomas Nelson, HERE’S LIFE PUBLISHERS, San Bernardino, Ca, 1972.

Table 1 – Uniqueness of the Bible 
Screenshot of Table 1 Chart in Hope SG without Title


1All–Time Best Selling Books and Authors. (Internet Public Library, © 1995–2006 The Regents of the University of Michigan).
( Retrieved November 13, 2006.
2Josh McDowell, Evidence That Demands A Verdict, Historical Evidences for the Christian Faith, Revised Edition.
(© Campus Crusade for Christ, 1972, 1979. Published by Here’s Life Publishers, San Bernardino, CA, 1972, Chapter 1, pp. 15–24).
3Ibid, pp.39–65.
4Ibid, pp. 42.
5Ibid, pp.53–56.

2 thoughts on “The Uniqueness of The Bible – Part 1

  1. As a Muslim I found this a very interesting read. Though I must dispute some of your claims.

    With regards to your claim about the continuity and textual similarity to the organically document as unsurpassable, what about The Qur’an? It has remained in it’s pure form since it was revealed. In the language it was revealed in. This is the way it was and is read today.

    I find it astounding that a ‘book of God’ can be written by 40 authors, yet claimed to be better in terms of textual accuracy than a book which has not been altered, and compiled by one scribe. It simply does not make sense. Surely The book of God must come from God himself. The Qur’an is the direct and unaltered word of God, memorised by The Prophet Muhammad and his companions, and then compiled into one book. Every copy today is identical to that book. How can you claim The Bible to be the pure command of God, when there are multiple copies in existence? When it is not available in it’s pure form? When The Pope, as a head of a religion for example, reads from The Latin Bible. Did Jesus (may peace be upon him) speak Latin?

    I see no continuity in The Christian Bible. Of course undoubtebly it contains truths, as does the Old Testament. As a Muslim I believe that these scriptures were once pure and unaltered, hence some agreements can be found with The Qur’an. The same God after all, sent all three books to man. But it is the hand of man that you praise, the 40 or so authors, that invalidates the text. This is why The Qur’an was sent down, to be the final unaltered message as had been delivered to mankind as Torah and The Bible before they were altered.

    Thank you for reading, and I hope this provokes some thought, after all if we don’t question ourselves and why we believe what we believe in, and whether it is right or not, there really is no point in believing!

    • Thank you for response. You have articulated several important issues. In general, I am familiar with your thought that the Bible has been compromised, and that the Qur’an has remained in its pure form from its inception. However, I respectfully submit to you that such a position is not consistent with the facts. Much has been written on this subject, both by Biblical scholars and Islamic scholars. I will not add to this particular discourse in my response, but I will cite a brief response which can be found at this link –

      What I would like to address is your concern that a divine manuscript authored by God through 40 individuals is less trustworthy than a manuscript authored by a single individual. Consider this simple illustration. Suppose you asked a single person to think of a number between 1 and 10. The person might claim that God gave him a number, but then many people throughout history have claimed that God spoke to them. Now suppose you asked 40 different people (who were not in contact with each other) to come up with a number, and they all came with the same exact number. Such a thing would be beyond probability. It would be super-natural, beyond natural explanation. That is point we’re making when we write that the Bible was written by 40 different people, and yet the result is one story with perfect harmony centered about one character. It is as if each of them came up with the same number.

      A single musician does not need a conductor to play a beautiful piece of music. But an orchestra cannot play a beautiful symphony without the direction of a conductor. The harmony, the textual and archeological reliability and the prophetic record of the Bible all indicate that its composition was directed by a single magnificent divine Being.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s